Quantcast

The DNAinfo archives brought to you by WNYC.
Read the press release here.

No Verdict Yet in Double Police Murder; Jury to Reconvene Wednesday

By Erica Demarest | May 5, 2015 6:50pm | Updated on May 5, 2015 10:47pm
 Timothy Herring, 24, was charged with murdering Officer Michael Flisk (l.) and Stephen Peters (r.).
Timothy Herring, 24, was charged with murdering Officer Michael Flisk (l.) and Stephen Peters (r.).
View Full Caption
Facebook; Family

COOK COUNTY CRIMINAL COURTHOUSE — After nearly seven hours of deliberation, a jury failed to reach a verdict in the murder case against Timothy Herring, a South Chicago man accused of killing a Chicago Police officer and retired Chicago Housing Authority officer in 2010.

The jury was sequestered until 10 a.m. Wednesday, when deliberations will continue.

Herring faces murder charges in the 2010 double homicide of Officer Michael Flisk, 46, and Stephen Peters, 44. Both men were shot in the head on Nov. 26, 2010, as Flisk investigated a burglary to Peters' prized Mustang.

Herring, then a 19-year-old parolee, was charged with murder a few days later and held without bail. His trial began April 27 and was originally expected to last more than two weeks. But on Tuesday afternoon, attorneys presented their closing arguments.

 Timothy Herring, 24, faces mandatory life in prison if convicted.
Timothy Herring, 24, faces mandatory life in prison if convicted.
View Full Caption
Cook County Sheriff's Department

Prosecutors have argued that Herring shot Flisk and Peters on Nov. 26, 2010, to cover up a burglary he committed earlier that day in the 8100 block of South Burnham Avenue.

Prosecutors said Herring broke into Peters' Mustang that morning and stashed what he stole in a nearby garbage can. When Herring allegedly returned later in the day to pick up the goods, he overheard Flisk, a longtime evidence technician, tell Peters he found a good fingerprint. Herring then opened fire, striking both men in their heads, prosecutors said.

But Herring's public defenders argued police have no substantial physical evidence linking Herring to the crime.

And while several witnesses have come forward with damning testimony, attorney Julie Koehler pointed out there's a reward in play.

"The state's case is based upon the statements of people who are seeking a $20,000 reward and have every intention to come into this courtroom and point the finger at Tim and get that money," Koehler said after court last week. "The reward only pays out for the arrest — and conviction — of Timothy Herring."

On the first day of the trial, Herring's friend, Tranay Smith, testified that she picked up Herring and brought him to her house shortly after the shooting. Smith, 27, had noticed a lot of police in the area and called Herring "being a friend" because she knew Herring was wearing an electronic monitoring bracelet as a condition of his recent parole, she said.

"He told me to come and get him," Smith said, adding that she met Herring near 81st Street and Muskegon Avenue — about a block from the shooting site. "He said 'go.' ... He was acting paranoid. He was just looking around."

Smith said she took Herring to her house in the 8300 block of South Phillips Avenue, where he allegedly cut his hair using scissors from her dresser. Herring asked whether police cars had cameras before admitting to shooting two people, Smith testified.

"He just said he shot two people," Smith said, noting he didn't specify whether he killed either of them.

Herring removed a gun from his waistband, according to Smith, and stashed it in a Huggie's diaper box in Smith's closet. Her son was 1 at the time. Smith testified that a mutual friend came by the house later that day to pick up Herring's gun and other belongings.

Herring's attorneys were quick to point out that Smith told police an entirely different story after the shooting. She never mentioned her involvement or Herring's alleged confession until after the reward was announced.

Smith testified last week that she originally lied to police because "I was scared."

The defense team questioned Smith's credibility, noting that she is currently awaiting trial for an aggravated battery charge. If convicted, Smith, who has a 6-year-old son, could spend three to seven years in prison. She testified against Herring as a witness for the State's Attorney's Office — the same office that was charging her in the battery case.

If he's convicted, Herring could face mandatory life in prison.

For more neighborhood news, listen to DNAinfo Radio here: