Quantcast

Ousted Red-Light Camera Vendor Rakes in Windfall in Contract's Final Months

By Mike Brockway | April 25, 2014 7:30pm | Updated on April 28, 2014 10:38am
 A Xerox contractor installs a new red light camera at the corner of Clark Street and Irving Park Road.
A Xerox contractor installs a new red light camera at the corner of Clark Street and Irving Park Road.
View Full Caption
The Expired Meter

CHICAGO — Even as Redflex Traffic Systems' scandal-plagued 11-year tenure operating the nation's largest red-light camera system was ending, it was a particularly lucrative year for the company.

The last Redlfex cameras — at the intersection of Grand, Kostner and North — were turned off in February, but in the year before that, the company raked in $24 million, city records show, the second most profitable year in the company's Chicago history.

The money flowed in even after February 2013, the date the company was banned from bidding on new work with the city. Xerox Local Solutions now runs the city's red-light camera system.

"Redflex is out of the picture and [everything is] under the control of Xerox," Chicago Department of Transportation spokesman Pete Scales said Friday. "Their contract is over and we have no financial relationship with Redflex now."

Redflex was unceremoniously banned from bidding to maintain control of the cameras after the Tribune revealed an alleged bribery scandal that found the CDOT Deputy Commissioner overseeing the program accepted tickets to sporting events, luxury hotel accommodations, meals and other gifts from company executives. Federal authorities are now investigating the allegations.

The company, which helped the city launch and then grow its red-light camera system from a handful of cameras and intersections to 384 cameras at about 190 locations citywide, has earned nearly $125 million since the program's inception in 2003.

Redflex's contract was extended three times after it was originally set to expire in January  2013 to allow the city to select a new vendor and allow the cameras to be transitioned to the new company.

Only 2011 was more profitable for Redflex than last year. That year, the city had greatly expanded the scope of its program and payments to Redflex totaled more than $25 million that year. 

Now that Xerox has complete control of the system, crews are converting the old hardware to their new Drivesafe camera technology at the remaining 174 intersections with cameras. The city took 32 cameras at 16 intersections out of service as of January due to decreases in crashes at those locations.

Xerox's new hardware, according to CDOT officials is a vast improvement over the former system and will save money in the long run.

The Redflex system utilized magnetic inductive wiring installed below the surface of the pavement to sense vehicles and trigger the cameras when a car entered the intersection after the signal turned red. This proved to be problematic if the pavement became damaged, forcing the city to temporarily take a red-light camera out of service until repairs could be made.

Xerox's Drivesafe system uses radar, which the company says will allow the system to track a vehicle's position, speed and direction for much longer distances than previously.

"The new DriveSafe red-light enforcement camera system being deployed in Chicago utilizes a small tracking radar for detecting vehicles," said Todd Jackson, director of technology for Xerox State and Local Solutions. "As a result it is less invasive, requires less infrastructure and the systems remain operable during street projects."

CDOT Deputy Director David Zavattero believes the Xerox technology is a step up from Redflex's system.

"With the magnetic induction loops, any disruption to the pavement — potholes, cracks — the loops get damaged," explains Zavattero. "The radar technology is mounted on a pole. It's non-intrusive and off the road which is preferable to us."

The new Xerox system have an added benefit to the city that allows the 352 cameras to be used by the police department; the Xerox cameras can pan 360 degrees and stream live video back to police. The new cameras increase the number of surveillance cameras to 24,500, officials said.

While police haven't used the cameras yet, police spokesman Adam Collins says his department is working with Xerox to incorporate them into the city's already extensive camera system.

"We welcome technology advancements that may have a potential public safety benefit, and we're working with other city agencies and their vendors to determine possible uses for this very new technology," said Collins.

But the potential addition of hundreds of cameras to the city's police surveillance system raised concerns at the ACLU of Illinois, which last year called the 22,000 public and private cameras the police had access to a "frightening number."

Ed Yohnka, a spokesman for ACLU Illinois, says Chicago needs to adopt more regulations like are on the books in Pittsburgh and Washington, D.C., to protect the privacy rights of citizens.

This "is an exponential growth in the scope of surveillance cameras," said Yohnka. "If the red-light cameras now can be used as part of a surveillance system, the same regulations or lack of regulations as far as privacy are now applied to the red-light cameras."

Despite the change in vendors, opponents of automated traffic-camera enforcement like the Wisconsin-based National Motorists Association are wary of Xerox as the program's new operator.

"Redflex has been embroiled in a multi-state bribery scandal so it's probably wise to part ways with them, but Xerox has had issues if its own," says the NMA's John Bowman. "In Baltimore, a city audit found that the Xerox-managed speed camera program had error rates in excess of 10 percent. That's roughly 70,000 faulty tickets a year."

But CDOT Deputy Commissioner Larry McPhillips says the city is happy with the decision to choose Xerox as the new vendor.

"We're satisfied with Xerox's performance so far," said McPhillips. "We still have a long way to go, but so far so good."

For more neighborhood news, listen to DNAinfo Radio here: