Quantcast

The DNAinfo archives brought to you by WNYC.
Read the press release here.

Staten Island Election a One Horse Race as Single Candidate Runs

By Nicholas Rizzi | July 28, 2015 10:11am
 Assemblyman Joe Borelli (left) will run unopposed in the special election  to fill Vincent Ignizio's vacant City Council seat.
Assemblyman Joe Borelli (left) will run unopposed in the special election to fill Vincent Ignizio's vacant City Council seat.
View Full Caption
Twitter/Joe Borelli

STATEN ISLAND — A special election to replace Vincent Ignizio in the City Council is already a done deal — only a single candidate has filed to run.

Assemblyman Joe Borelli will run unopposed for the 51st Council seat, which serves the South Shore of Staten Island,  as nobody else had entered the race by the Monday deadline, according to the Board of Elections.

"I'm glad to hear I'll be representing the people of the South Shore once again," Borelli said.

"This doesn't effect how we're going to campaign. We'll still be at block parties, we'll still be knocking on doors, we'll still be at supermarkets."

The Republican Borelli, who was officially put on the ballot last week, will run on the "South Shore First" line since the special election is non-partisan.

Mayor Bill de Blasio set the special election to replace Ignizio — who vacated his seat on July 10 to take a job as CEO for Catholic Charities of Staten Island — for Nov. 3.

Borelli will have to run again in 2016 to keep the council seat and will vacate his assembly seat as soon as he's sworn in. Gov. Andrew Cuomo can call a special election to fill that vacancy or wait until the next State Assembly general election in 2016.

Borelli, who previously served as Ignizio's chief of staff, promised to fight for middle class residents of the outer boroughs when he gets into the council.

"The council's much more of a  hotbed of controversy and I intend to insert myself as appropriate," he said.

"Somebody has to speak for the millions of outer-borough, middle class homeowners that are lately placed on the back burner of city policy."