De Blasio Used LICH as a Political Prop, Angry Ex-Supporters Say

By Colby Hamilton and Nikhita Venugopal  on June 4, 2014 7:12am

 Protesters hoisted a sign outside state Supreme Court ahead of continued negotiations over the fate of Long Island College Hospital on June 3, 2014.
Protesters hoisted a sign outside state Supreme Court ahead of continued negotiations over the fate of Long Island College Hospital on June 3, 2014.
View Full Caption
DNAinfo/Nikhita Venugopal

CIVIC CENTER — Just weeks after Mayor Bill de Blasio announced a “truly historic” deal that “kept the wolf from the door” of the threatened Long Island College Hospital, those who once supported the mayor say he's done nothing to prevent that deal from falling apart.

Although De Blasio's run for mayor surged forward when he was arrested last June during a protest to save the Brooklyn hospital, some former allies now accuse him of using the hospital as nothing more than a political prop.

“He gave us this false sense of hope that, if he was chosen to run the city, then LICH would be saved,” said Charlene Nimmons, president of the Wyckoff Gardens Tenants Association, who said she's been "very disappointed" with de Blasio in the months since he praised her work with LICH at a press conference at City Hall in February.

“He really spoke harshly about how Mayor Bloomberg was handling the situation, and how he was committed to making things better when he became mayor,” she added. "If you’re going to be a true progressive leader, then show it with your actions. His silence is speaking volumes about how he thinks of our community.”

She said it was a betrayal to the community when de Blasio chose to stand by and do nothing while the State University of New York, which owns the hospital, broke off deals with the top two bidders — one of which, The Peebles Corporation, is minority-owned.

It was a far cry from de Blasio's earlier promises to “insure healthcare for this community for the long term" by announcing a deal for a new round of bids for LICH in February that would include significant community input and guaranteed medical facilities.

“Today, we have a plan that leaves no one behind,” de Blasio said at the February press conference. "We have a plan that protects the healthcare needs of our community. And this guarantees the fundamental right to community healthcare for the 80,000 people who rely, first and foremost, on LICH today."

De Blasio continued to defend the status of the LICH talks as recently as last month.

"I'm convinced health care will be saved," de Blasio said. "I don't have any question about that."

“A year ago, LICH was about to close entirely. As a result of the hard work and legal actions of advocates and the community, that outright closure was avoided and key health care services have been preserved for the Brooklyn neighborhoods served by LICH," de Blasio spokesman Phil Walzak said in a statement. "Mayor de Blasio and the administration continue to work vigorously with SUNY, with the community, and with potential providers to maximize medical services and ensure continuity of care at LICH in the future.”

SUNY has since failed to come to an agreement with any of the top bidders, and could soon be a position to do exactly what community activists had worked so hard to avoid: sell the property to developers for top dollar, without the promise of a full-service hospital.

On Tuesday, community activists once again headed to State Supreme Court in Brooklyn, as SUNY and Fortis Property Group, the third-highest bidder under the deal touted by de Blasio, continue to negotiate a possible agreement. Fortis currently has no plans for a full-service hospital at the LICH site.

Dr. Saul Melman, an emergency room doctor at LICH who was laid off on May 22 when most of the hospital closed, was among those assembled outside the court Tuesday, holding up a sign demanding that de Blasio “man up” on LICH.

De Blasio "used the LICH issue to in order to become mayor,” Melman said. “Now that he’s mayor, he’s left the room.”

Melman said de Blasio’s statements of salvation for LICH in February were “untrue” and “premature,” and said the mayor hasn’t been involved in the fight since.

Political experts said de Blasio's failure to deliver on the LICH issue has far more implications than just disappointing some of his key allies.

It could spell trouble for de Blasio's other initiatives, from universal pre-kindergarten to the creation or preservation of 200,000 units of affordable housing, experts said.

Too many early failures to deliver on promises could endanger the mayor's reputation with an increasingly skeptical public and reduce his political capital.

“You have to be careful what you’re embracing as you’re trying to build up that political clout,” said David Birdsell, dean of the School of Public Affairs at Baruch College. “This is clearly a disappointment that will almost certainly be used by those who wish to question the administration’s competency.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement