New State Rules Put An End to Controversial Fracking Plans For City's Watershed

New regulations will prevent companies from using the controversial drilling practice in New York City's watershed.

By Heather Grossmann

DNAinfo News Editor

MANHATTAN — State environmental officials announced new rules Friday designed to make it extremely difficult for natural gas companies to use a controversial drilling practice near the city's upstate water supply.

City and state officials feared companies using a drilling method called "hydrofracking" — a process where water and chemicals are blasted at rock to extract natural gas — on a section of the Marcellus Shale would contaminate the unfiltered upstate watershed used for drinking water in New York City.

But a new two-tiered review process throws up a bureaucratic phalanx state officials designed to deter natural gas prospecting in the Catskill/Delaware watershed. Companies wanting to drill in the city's watershed would have to conduct separate costly and time-consuming environmental impact studies for each well they wanted to drill. For other areas, companies would have to rely on the state to tell them where to drill.

City lawmakers and officials praised the state's new rules.

"The watershed provides clean drinking water to over 8 million New Yorkers," City Council Speaker Christine Quinn said in a statement. "Drilling for natural gas in the watershed using a risky technique known as hydraulic fracturing could have widespread detrimental environmental and health effects for residents."

City officials had been railing against hydrofracking upstate for months, with Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and others calling for an outright ban.

Stringer said during his “Kill the Drill” campaign this year that if hydrofracking in the watershed contaminated New York City’s drinking water, it would cost taxpayers between $10 billion and $30 billion to build a purification system. The state said this is no longer a concern.

Still, Stringer is pulling for a ban.

“A complete ban on watershed drilling was the right thing a year ago, it’s the right thing today, and it will remain the right thing for as long as we debate hydraulic fracturing in New York,” Stringer said. “The state should go the full distance and enact a ban.”

 

Links

Comments comment

Log in to comment.
I believe they are backwards in thinking they should adopt the watershed policy to the non essential sheds as trial but they need to look into how it is drilled or going to be drilled in detail and make sure each step is followed through. Test wells for water quality should be drilled first. Also Pa. may need water soon. Even if they have successful wells now what happens when nature says it’s time and give those wells a good shaking.
Gregory Xedis | April 25, 2010
Yes but, the water sheds may exceed beyond the areas that the government has mapped out the finger lakes are fed from and to where? I know here they do in our town in Onondaga. They just might drill a few to prove a point and then what? Will the DEC change it to stream line it for the drilling?
Gregory Xedis | April 24, 2010
View all comments
See next article
GET LOCAL NEWS FIRST
Download the free DNAinfo.com application, and get the latest local news in the palm of your hand. DOWNLOAD
INSTANT GRATIFICATION
Do you need to know the minute a story breaks? Subscribe to RSS feeds for instant gratification.SUBSCRIBE
ADVERTISEMENT

DNAinfo Weekly Quiz
Twitter @dnainfofacebook
Video Update
twitter@dnainfo
    Weather Update