The DNAinfo archives brought to you by WNYC.
Read the press release here.

'Tenant Blacklist' Firms Could Be Regulated Under Proposed Legislation

By Dusica Malesevic | August 16, 2016 7:18pm
 'Tenant Blacklist' firms could be regulated under proposed City Council legislation.
'Tenant Blacklist' firms could be regulated under proposed City Council legislation.
View Full Caption
DNAinfo/Dartunorro Clark

NEW YORK CITY — Companies that create so-called "tenant blacklists" — used by landlords to deny prospective renters from getting apartments — could become regulated under a new piece of City Council legislation. 

The "blacklists" are created using housing court cases but the reason for the court case and its outcome are often not included in the reports, officials said. The lists are sold to landlords along with credit reports.

"It's insane that asserting your rights in court — or being wrongfully dragged to court by your landlord — can get you practically exiled from New York City," said Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer in a statement. 

The bill was authored by Councilman Ben Kallos, who introduced the legislation with Public Advocate Leticia James and Brewer in an announcement Tuesday. 

"This industry needs strong rules enforced by an equally strong consumer protection agency, so tenant screening doesn't equal wholesale discrimination," Brewer said. 

The proposed legislation would require the firms to provide a more complete picture. For each housing court case mentioned, information such as who initiated the case, the claims alleged, all parties involved, and the current status or outcome would be included, according to the press release.

It would also require anyone who assembles or evaluates screening reports that rely on court histories to register and get a license from the city's Department of Consumer Affairs. The department would also be tasked with enforcement, fining $500 per inaccurate report and up to $5,000 for noncompliance.

Firms that provide a list of those named in housing court cases without details such as the outcome of the case include CoreLogic Safe Rent, TransUnion Rental Screening Solution, On-Site and ALM, according to the release. CoreLogic and TransUnion did not respond to requests for comment on the legislation on Tuesday.

The Consumer Data Industry Association, which includes the nation's largest rental screening companies, responded on behalf of CoreLogic in an email statement Wednesday, saying the legislation has not yet been reviewed in detail, and pointing out that rental screening companies are already heavily regulated by the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act.

"New York City also regulates the practices of landlords via its Human Rights Law which prohibits discrimination in housing, employment and public accommodations," said Eric Ellman, senior vice president of public policy & legal affairs for the group. "A landlord’s review of data provided by a screening agency is always set into the context of NYC law."

According to the Daily News, companies like CoreLogic and TransUnion create their lists by cross-referencing index numbers, which they buy from the state court system, with court files.

The legislation, which has also received support from Assembly Member Daniel O’Donnell and State Senator Liz Krueger, would also allow a tenant to bring their own case in court if they believed they had been harmed by an inaccurate screening report.